The Massachusetts Colony was founded in 1628, but gained steam with the arrival of the Winthrop Fleet in 1630 and the founding of Boston, Edmund Lockwood, Thomas Howlett and Samuel French were among those Winthrop Fleet passengers.
Soon to follow were families named Williams, Greene, Gorton, Rhodes, Arnold and others. Ancestral families would continue to arrive in the colony through the end of the century under a variety of circumstances. Malcolm MacCallum arrived in 1651 as a Cromwellian prisoner of war indentured to the Lynn Iron Works. Hugh Mahurin would arrive about 1690, one of the last. He also toiled in the iron works of Massachusetts Bay.
Families like the Singletarys and Jennisons remained in Massachusetts until the early 1800s. With the death of Joseph Jennison in 1818 and the removal of son, Peter to New York by 1812, the last of the Massachusetts families had departed.
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Famiy Colonial & State Settlement: #1: Plymouth Colony
My ancestors settled in eleven colonies, two territories, and four states - that's taking places in chronological order. I can toss in three extra places, as well. Those will be explained later.
I'll take places in order: colony, then territory, then state.
First up, PLYMOUTH COLONY.
Founded 1620; 1st family arrived 1620
With the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620, the first of the family arrived in the name of William Brewster. Thomas Prence arrived the following year. Arthur Howland Sr. was in the colony by 1640. Arthur Howland Jr. remained a resident of the colony until Plymouth joined Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1691. Plymouth families would move to Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
I'll take places in order: colony, then territory, then state.
First up, PLYMOUTH COLONY.
Founded 1620; 1st family arrived 1620
With the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620, the first of the family arrived in the name of William Brewster. Thomas Prence arrived the following year. Arthur Howland Sr. was in the colony by 1640. Arthur Howland Jr. remained a resident of the colony until Plymouth joined Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1691. Plymouth families would move to Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Observations on royal lineage
Finding out that you have a royal line is sort of neat. It may be an English royal, a Scottish, Italian, Dutch, whatever. Actually the English royal heritage is more German than English, but I digress.
As neat as having a royal line or two is, I am more impressed with the noble's ancestors who became common folk. The may have ended up as simple farmers or craftsmen in their home counties. They may have been among those sent from English prisons to Australia, who started anew and became the town builders, station [ranch] owners and others who developed that island nation.
The Pilgrims, Puritans, Quakers, Mennonites, Amish and other religious groups who settled in America to follow their beliefs and battled the elements and other hardships to establish themselves are far more impressive than the princes of Medieval Europe.
The families who settled along the waterways and coastlines of the colonies to make their living as mariners, boatmen, ferry operators, traders, ship and boat builders were a few notches above the dukes and counts.
The farmers, merchants and craftsmen who settled the colonies, fought in the French and Indian War, and later fought for Independence were more noble than the kings who had denied them freedom.
The Scots-Irish, Northern border English and others who settled the frontier west of the Allegheny and Appalachian Mountains and gave birth to our first legendary heroes, like Daniel Boone and David Crockett, were greater than the Crusaders.
The Irish, German, Scandinavian, Italian and other European immigrants who came to escape famine, war and despotism were a notch above their blue-blood rulers.
Don't forget the indentured servants and slaves brought over to work for those wealthy land owners and businessmen; the Chinese bought to help build the western leg of the transcontinental railroad; European Jews escaping extermination during the 1930s-40s.
The stories of these people are far more interesting than those of the nobles.
As neat as having a royal line or two is, I am more impressed with the noble's ancestors who became common folk. The may have ended up as simple farmers or craftsmen in their home counties. They may have been among those sent from English prisons to Australia, who started anew and became the town builders, station [ranch] owners and others who developed that island nation.
The Pilgrims, Puritans, Quakers, Mennonites, Amish and other religious groups who settled in America to follow their beliefs and battled the elements and other hardships to establish themselves are far more impressive than the princes of Medieval Europe.
The families who settled along the waterways and coastlines of the colonies to make their living as mariners, boatmen, ferry operators, traders, ship and boat builders were a few notches above the dukes and counts.
The farmers, merchants and craftsmen who settled the colonies, fought in the French and Indian War, and later fought for Independence were more noble than the kings who had denied them freedom.
The Scots-Irish, Northern border English and others who settled the frontier west of the Allegheny and Appalachian Mountains and gave birth to our first legendary heroes, like Daniel Boone and David Crockett, were greater than the Crusaders.
The Irish, German, Scandinavian, Italian and other European immigrants who came to escape famine, war and despotism were a notch above their blue-blood rulers.
Don't forget the indentured servants and slaves brought over to work for those wealthy land owners and businessmen; the Chinese bought to help build the western leg of the transcontinental railroad; European Jews escaping extermination during the 1930s-40s.
The stories of these people are far more interesting than those of the nobles.
Friday, February 23, 2018
Audrey Barlow's ancestry
After a preliminary look at what's available online, it seems that Audrey Barlow not only has a couple of connections to the Magna Carta Sureties, but a strong Plantagenet lineage as well. Her ancestry reaches back to William Longspee, illegitimate son of Henry II and, apparently, King John, son of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine.
There is still some work to do on sorting out who begat whom, but Audrey's lineage could turn out to be quite interesting. More as it gets sorted out.
There is still some work to do on sorting out who begat whom, but Audrey's lineage could turn out to be quite interesting. More as it gets sorted out.
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Ancestors on Opposite Sides of the Fence
I discovered some time ago that one of my Welsh Quaker lines descended from King John. If you are not familiar with King John, he was forced by English barons to sign the Magna Carta in 1215. The Magna Carta limited the power of the King. John was a bit of a stinker as kings went. For fictional references rent Robin Hood [either Errol Flynn or Disney version] on DVD.
In trolling for incomplete families, I came across a link to Audrey Barlow, wife of William Almy, "Descents from Magna Carta Sureties to Audrey [Barlow] Almy." It seems as though Audrey was descended from two of the barons who confronted King John back in 1215.
I will have to investigate to see if this lineage pans out. Audrey is also supposed to be a descendant of Charlemagne! The last time I recall a supposed descendant of Charlemagne in the family tree, the research was called into question by a noted NEHGS researcher/author. The connections were a bit of a stretch.
So, I will do some more work on Audrey and report the findings, be they positive or negative.
In trolling for incomplete families, I came across a link to Audrey Barlow, wife of William Almy, "Descents from Magna Carta Sureties to Audrey [Barlow] Almy." It seems as though Audrey was descended from two of the barons who confronted King John back in 1215.
I will have to investigate to see if this lineage pans out. Audrey is also supposed to be a descendant of Charlemagne! The last time I recall a supposed descendant of Charlemagne in the family tree, the research was called into question by a noted NEHGS researcher/author. The connections were a bit of a stretch.
So, I will do some more work on Audrey and report the findings, be they positive or negative.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Elizur and Sarah [Wright] Collins
Once again, I ventured into the world of "Ancestors without Info." I had the names of Elizabeth Collins Gorton's parents, Elizur Collins and Sarah Wright, but nothing else in my files. A search for Elizur turned up some interesting details.
First Generation
1. He died on 29 Sep 1683 at the age of 61 in Warwick, King's Province, Rhode Island, British America. 2 Elizur Collins was born in England in 1622. He was called aged 45 in 1667.
Collins arrived in Rhode Island about 1641, presumably with his parents and sister, Ann. The name of his father has not yet been learned. His mother, Ann, married former Rhode Island President [1649-50], John Smith, who died in 1663.
On 7 May 1655, Elizur and StukleyWestcott were ordered to collect damages due the Indians. Each man was to "give his share according to his proportion."
A warrant from the Town Deputy would be issued against anyone who refused.
Ann Smith was appointed sole executrix to her late husband's estate by the Town Council on 14 Sep 1663. Elizur Collins was due £200 as a legacy given him and his sister Ann, deceased. As a result of Ann's death, Elizar received the full legacy. His mother was ordered to "make over all housings and lands in Warwick of John Smith" to Elizur as security. Ann was to enjoy her late husband's property for life. If any kin of John Smith appeared, they were to receive five shillings.
Elizur was made a lieutenant in the local militia by 1664 and served as Deputy to the General Assembly from Warwick in 1672, 1673 and 1678.
Collins married Sarah Wright about 1664 in Warwick.
On 20 May 1678, Elizur, with the consent of his mother and wife, sold two lots in Warwick Neck and a town lot to Jonathan Knight.
Ann Collins Smith died on 2 Nov 1678.
A Jury of Grand Inquest met on 29 October 1683. The jury declared that having made inquiry into the death of Lt. Elizur Collins, that on 29 September of that year that the said Elizur Collins, found dead in his home, had taken his own life by hanging.
Sarah married John Porter on 7 Jan 1684. She died in Warwick about 1700, although some sources report her death as 1726.
Collins arrived in Rhode Island about 1641, presumably with his parents and sister, Ann. The name of his father has not yet been learned. His mother, Ann, married former Rhode Island President [1649-50], John Smith, who died in 1663.
On 7 May 1655, Elizur and StukleyWestcott were ordered to collect damages due the Indians. Each man was to "give his share according to his proportion."
A warrant from the Town Deputy would be issued against anyone who refused.
Ann Smith was appointed sole executrix to her late husband's estate by the Town Council on 14 Sep 1663. Elizur Collins was due £200 as a legacy given him and his sister Ann, deceased. As a result of Ann's death, Elizar received the full legacy. His mother was ordered to "make over all housings and lands in Warwick of John Smith" to Elizur as security. Ann was to enjoy her late husband's property for life. If any kin of John Smith appeared, they were to receive five shillings.
Elizur was made a lieutenant in the local militia by 1664 and served as Deputy to the General Assembly from Warwick in 1672, 1673 and 1678.
Collins married Sarah Wright about 1664 in Warwick.
On 20 May 1678, Elizur, with the consent of his mother and wife, sold two lots in Warwick Neck and a town lot to Jonathan Knight.
Ann Collins Smith died on 2 Nov 1678.
A Jury of Grand Inquest met on 29 October 1683. The jury declared that having made inquiry into the death of Lt. Elizur Collins, that on 29 September of that year that the said Elizur Collins, found dead in his home, had taken his own life by hanging.
Sarah married John Porter on 7 Jan 1684. She died in Warwick about 1700, although some sources report her death as 1726.
Elizur Collins and Sarah Wright2 were married circa 1643 in Warwick, Rhode Island, British America.1–2 Sarah Wright1 was born circa 1624.2 She died circa 1700 at the age of 76 in Warwick, King's Province, Rhode Island, British America. 2 She was also known as Sarah Collins.1
Elizur Collins and Sarah Wright had the following children:
Second Generation
2. He died in 1712 at the age of 44 in Rhode Island. 2 William married Sarah Wightman in April 1697 in Kingston, RI.
3. She died on 9 Sep 1724 at the age of 51 in Warwick, Kent Co., Rhode Island. 3 She was also known as Elizabeth Gorton.3
Elizabeth Collins and Samuel Gorton were married on 9 May 1695 in Warwick, Kent Co., Rhode Island.3 He died on 5 Jun 1722 at the age of 49 in Warwick, Kent Co., Rhode Island. 3 Samuel Gorton was Deputy to the Rhode Island Legislature from 1714-1718. He bequeathed to his wife Elizabeth use of his household and all movables; to son Edward the old place where his father, John, had dwelt and a lot at Horses Neck; to son Samuel his homestead farm; to son William a lot at Soweset; and to daughters Ann, Margaret, Sarah and Elizabeth money, etc.
Samuel Gorton and Elizabeth Collins had the following children:
Sources:
1. Adelos Gorton, The Life and Times of Samuel Gorton (George S. Ferguson, Philadelphia, PA, 1907), p. 169.
2. "Rootsweb World Connect", database, Ancestry.com, Ancestry Rootsweb (www.ancestry.rootsweb.com : accessed 15 February 2018), "35102," Elizur Collins - Sarah Wright; submitted August 2001 by Unknown, [contact information for private use]; citing Gen. Dictionary of RI [p. 51-52].
3. Adelos Gorton, The Life and Times of Samuel Gorton, p. 168-169.
4. Family History and Story of Samuel Gorton: First governor of Providence Plantations of Rhode Island, and founder of Warwick, Rhode Island, author: Kay Gorton ThompsonRhode Island GenWeb online [http://www.rootsweb.com/~rigenweb/article20.html].
Monday, February 19, 2018
Female Ancestor Search: Marriage Records
I somewhat dismissed marriage records when I introduced the searching for female ancestors series of posts. That was not intentional.
If you have the groom's name and have a pretty good idea of where he was living at about the time the couple married, your odds of finding the marriage are, at least, fair. [Case in point. Once I found out that Jacob Crousore was living in Clinton Co., OH during the early 1820s, it was possible to locate his marriage to Jemima Smith. Further research proved her to be Ama Jemima Smith.]
There is always the chance that the bride and groom lived in different parishes [British Isles], towns or even states. [The couple might have lived in adjoining counties in different states.] So when you are searching for a marriage record, expand your search to neighboring jurisdictions. Chances are the couple married on the bride's home turf.
As with any search, be creative with spelling. Jacob Crousore mentioned above turned up as Crouser, Crowser, Crosser, Crowsor, Crowsore and a number of other variations in records. Your family may have "always spelled your name that way," but that doesn't mean town clerks and other folks did. And remember, your ancestor might have been lacking in the ability to read or write, so they had no idea how to spell the name anyway.
If you come across a marriage record on an online tree that has an accessible image, click on the image. Make sure the image matches the couple in question. It seems that the new favorite activity for some researchers is to find a marriage license, or similar document, that matches the name of one of spouses, the date of the event, and, maybe, the location.
Example: Walter Franks married Emma Hertz on 12 March 1845 in Pittsburgh, PA. There is an image that documents the marriage event. You click on the image and find the following: Walter Franks married Anna Hurst on 12 March 1845 in Uniontown, PA. It's a great find if you are related to Walter and Anna. As for Walter and Emma? Useless.
Also, make sure what the date or dates on the marriage document represent. Was it the date that the couple applied for the license? The date of the marriage return? The date banns was posted? The date of the marriage itself?
If you have the groom's name and have a pretty good idea of where he was living at about the time the couple married, your odds of finding the marriage are, at least, fair. [Case in point. Once I found out that Jacob Crousore was living in Clinton Co., OH during the early 1820s, it was possible to locate his marriage to Jemima Smith. Further research proved her to be Ama Jemima Smith.]
There is always the chance that the bride and groom lived in different parishes [British Isles], towns or even states. [The couple might have lived in adjoining counties in different states.] So when you are searching for a marriage record, expand your search to neighboring jurisdictions. Chances are the couple married on the bride's home turf.
As with any search, be creative with spelling. Jacob Crousore mentioned above turned up as Crouser, Crowser, Crosser, Crowsor, Crowsore and a number of other variations in records. Your family may have "always spelled your name that way," but that doesn't mean town clerks and other folks did. And remember, your ancestor might have been lacking in the ability to read or write, so they had no idea how to spell the name anyway.
If you come across a marriage record on an online tree that has an accessible image, click on the image. Make sure the image matches the couple in question. It seems that the new favorite activity for some researchers is to find a marriage license, or similar document, that matches the name of one of spouses, the date of the event, and, maybe, the location.
Example: Walter Franks married Emma Hertz on 12 March 1845 in Pittsburgh, PA. There is an image that documents the marriage event. You click on the image and find the following: Walter Franks married Anna Hurst on 12 March 1845 in Uniontown, PA. It's a great find if you are related to Walter and Anna. As for Walter and Emma? Useless.
Also, make sure what the date or dates on the marriage document represent. Was it the date that the couple applied for the license? The date of the marriage return? The date banns was posted? The date of the marriage itself?
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Researching Female Ancestors: Too Many Options!
There is one category of female ancestors that I neglected: What if you have more than one surname for your mystery lady?
Every now and then researchers will determine the maiden name of a female based on perfectly sound research. Yet another researcher will come along and, based on perfectly sound evidence, determine that a different surname should be associated with this woman. In some instances the earlier research will gain new popularity, bringing the debate to the forefront once again.
If this woman happens to be your ancestor, what do you do?
1) Acknowledge both research findings. State the arguments of each and record the sources used in each case.
2) Examine each source cited in both arguments. Look for strengths and weaknesses in each piece of evidence.
3) Make a timeline for both maiden names and the husband. See how the facts and assumptions fit with the chronology of the family.
4) Conduct your own research. Cross-check the "known sources." Look for new evidence. See what fits logically. Note the sources that are marginal or questionable in support of the argument each supported.
5) Make a sound, well-researched evaluation of the information on the woman in question and write up your arguments, pro and con. Write up your narrative explaining why you chose one surname over the other - with supporting evidence.
6) If the evidence does not sway you one way or the other, go back to #1 above. Present both sides in your narrative. Acknowledge that you feel there is not overwhelming evidence in support of either argument.
Wow! Tis is Blog post #1200!!😎
Every now and then researchers will determine the maiden name of a female based on perfectly sound research. Yet another researcher will come along and, based on perfectly sound evidence, determine that a different surname should be associated with this woman. In some instances the earlier research will gain new popularity, bringing the debate to the forefront once again.
If this woman happens to be your ancestor, what do you do?
1) Acknowledge both research findings. State the arguments of each and record the sources used in each case.
2) Examine each source cited in both arguments. Look for strengths and weaknesses in each piece of evidence.
3) Make a timeline for both maiden names and the husband. See how the facts and assumptions fit with the chronology of the family.
4) Conduct your own research. Cross-check the "known sources." Look for new evidence. See what fits logically. Note the sources that are marginal or questionable in support of the argument each supported.
5) Make a sound, well-researched evaluation of the information on the woman in question and write up your arguments, pro and con. Write up your narrative explaining why you chose one surname over the other - with supporting evidence.
6) If the evidence does not sway you one way or the other, go back to #1 above. Present both sides in your narrative. Acknowledge that you feel there is not overwhelming evidence in support of either argument.
Wow! Tis is Blog post #1200!!😎
Saturday, February 17, 2018
Female Ancestors: Cemetery and Burial Records
Cemetery and burial records may hold the clue to 4th great-grandma's maiden name. You may have to work outside the box a bit, however, the farther back you go.
Study the list of burials closely for any clues.
If the cemetery is an older one, with only a few families interred there, find out if the families were related in anyway. They may have just been neighbors, but the folks may have belonged to 3-4 families that intermarried.
If you are working from church cemetery burials, find out what other records are available for the church.
Check for burial permits or other cemetery records that may offer clues. Who purchased the plot? Who else is buried in the plot? Of course you may run into "Mrs. Howard Smith" in the burial record.
Although they are more recent records, try to find death certificates. The parents may be given, providing the informant has knowledge of the decedent's parents. Death certificate searches apply mostly to post-1880 deaths.
The biggest stumbling block in this record group is having your ancestor buried in an unmarked grave and missing from the records.
Study the list of burials closely for any clues.
If the cemetery is an older one, with only a few families interred there, find out if the families were related in anyway. They may have just been neighbors, but the folks may have belonged to 3-4 families that intermarried.
If you are working from church cemetery burials, find out what other records are available for the church.
Check for burial permits or other cemetery records that may offer clues. Who purchased the plot? Who else is buried in the plot? Of course you may run into "Mrs. Howard Smith" in the burial record.
Although they are more recent records, try to find death certificates. The parents may be given, providing the informant has knowledge of the decedent's parents. Death certificate searches apply mostly to post-1880 deaths.
The biggest stumbling block in this record group is having your ancestor buried in an unmarked grave and missing from the records.
Friday, February 16, 2018
Trying to Find Female Ancestors in Probate Records
Probate records can be useful, but perhaps a bit more difficult to use than some other record groups.
Your best bet is to find will or probate indexes to locate your male ancestor. Study the names of people named in the will, inventory or estate settlement. Learn the relationship of each person to the testator, especially cousins or kinsmen. Identify the witnesses and executors [if not wife or son] to see why they were involved. Relative? Business associate? Neighbor? Do the same with the inventory and final settlement papers.
You could get lucky and find a brother, unmarried sister or even the wife's father named somewhere in the probate packet.
Your best bet is to find will or probate indexes to locate your male ancestor. Study the names of people named in the will, inventory or estate settlement. Learn the relationship of each person to the testator, especially cousins or kinsmen. Identify the witnesses and executors [if not wife or son] to see why they were involved. Relative? Business associate? Neighbor? Do the same with the inventory and final settlement papers.
You could get lucky and find a brother, unmarried sister or even the wife's father named somewhere in the probate packet.
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Finding Clues to Female Ancestors in Naming Children
Names of children can offer clues to the mother's maiden name. If you have a family that repeats common first names from generation to generation, disregard this post. John, James, Mary and Sarah appearing in six consecutive generations probably won't help much.
If relatively uncommon names or names more commonly associated with being surnames appear, you may be on to something. For example:
Lucas Brady and his wife Alice have the following children:
Rebecca [f]
Lucas Jr. [m]
Carl [m]
Alice [f]
Walker [m]
Dale [f]
Thurman [m]
Walker, Dale and Thurman could be either given names or surnames. Search neighboring families for those three names - first and last.
If you come up with a Thurman Walker married to a woman named Rebecca in the census, investigate tat family! If they have a daughter Alice, you may have the right family. If the Walkers live next to Robert and Mary Dale, it may be time to celebrate. [Providing ages fit as parents or siblings.]
If an uncommon given name like Ebenezer shows up in 2-3 generations of a family, look for an Ebenezer who is old enough to be the father of the wife in the earliest generation.
Some families may have a mix of traditional and nontraditional given names that repeat themselves over a few generations. Look for that type of pattern to help with female ancestors.
My 3rd great-grandfather, Cornelius Prall, Jr., took "family naming to extremes. Had the maiden name of his wife, Elizabeth, not already been known, there were clues galore among the kids:
Susannah Baker
Garrison
Rebecca Garrison
Elizabeth Rittenhouse
Isaac Rittenhouse
Squire
Lucretia
John Rittenhouse
Asher Garrison
Ellis Free
Amy R.
Cornelius and Elizabeth named several of their children for family members:
Susannah Baker - Elizabeth's mother
Garrison - mother's maiden name
Rebecca Garrison - mother
Elizabeth Rittenhouse - we have Cornelius' wife's full name
Isaac Rittenhouse - Elizabeth's father
Squire, Lucretia, Ellis Free - ??
John Rittenhouse - Elizabeth's surname again
Asher Garrison - mother's maiden name again
Amy R. - suspect the R is for Rittenhouse
Not all couples are that accommodating!
If relatively uncommon names or names more commonly associated with being surnames appear, you may be on to something. For example:
Lucas Brady and his wife Alice have the following children:
Rebecca [f]
Lucas Jr. [m]
Carl [m]
Alice [f]
Walker [m]
Dale [f]
Thurman [m]
Walker, Dale and Thurman could be either given names or surnames. Search neighboring families for those three names - first and last.
If you come up with a Thurman Walker married to a woman named Rebecca in the census, investigate tat family! If they have a daughter Alice, you may have the right family. If the Walkers live next to Robert and Mary Dale, it may be time to celebrate. [Providing ages fit as parents or siblings.]
If an uncommon given name like Ebenezer shows up in 2-3 generations of a family, look for an Ebenezer who is old enough to be the father of the wife in the earliest generation.
Some families may have a mix of traditional and nontraditional given names that repeat themselves over a few generations. Look for that type of pattern to help with female ancestors.
My 3rd great-grandfather, Cornelius Prall, Jr., took "family naming to extremes. Had the maiden name of his wife, Elizabeth, not already been known, there were clues galore among the kids:
Susannah Baker
Garrison
Rebecca Garrison
Elizabeth Rittenhouse
Isaac Rittenhouse
Squire
Lucretia
John Rittenhouse
Asher Garrison
Ellis Free
Amy R.
Cornelius and Elizabeth named several of their children for family members:
Susannah Baker - Elizabeth's mother
Garrison - mother's maiden name
Rebecca Garrison - mother
Elizabeth Rittenhouse - we have Cornelius' wife's full name
Isaac Rittenhouse - Elizabeth's father
Squire, Lucretia, Ellis Free - ??
John Rittenhouse - Elizabeth's surname again
Asher Garrison - mother's maiden name again
Amy R. - suspect the R is for Rittenhouse
Not all couples are that accommodating!
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
Searching for Female Ancestors in Deeds
Deeds can be another hiding place for female ancestors. When a tract of land was sold, the wife generally had to relinquish her dower right. If so, her was included in the deed. Chances are you won't find a maiden name given, but there may be clues. Look at the names given in the deed, purchaser, neighbors, witnesses. Find out who these people are. If the word "kinsman" is used, you may be on to something. Kinsman could refer to a member of the wife's family. Witnesses could be relatives as well.
There is also the chance that the wife's maiden name could make it into the deed. If the land being sold or purchased was part of the wife's inheritance, you might find her father's name mentioned. If the land is being sold to, say, the wife's brother, that relationship may be given in the deed.
If there are any marginal notes on the page of the deed, read them! You never know what might be there. The clerk may have made a reference to the spouse's maiden name. Another family event may be scribbled into the margin. The wife's birth date may be there along with names of her parents. Paper was at a premium!
There is also the chance that the wife's maiden name could make it into the deed. If the land being sold or purchased was part of the wife's inheritance, you might find her father's name mentioned. If the land is being sold to, say, the wife's brother, that relationship may be given in the deed.
If there are any marginal notes on the page of the deed, read them! You never know what might be there. The clerk may have made a reference to the spouse's maiden name. Another family event may be scribbled into the margin. The wife's birth date may be there along with names of her parents. Paper was at a premium!
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Tracking down female ancestors: Census records
Even though you may not know the maiden name of a female ancestor, census records can be a valuable tool in trying to locate them. The 1850-1880 are particularly good resources. Most of the 1890 census was lost and after 1900 better records were being kept. The chances of finding a marriage record for your couple were improving greatly.
1880 was the first census to give relationships of those enumerated to the head of the household. If you see a person listed as an in-law, cousin, aunt, uncle, niece or nephew, then you may have a clue to the maiden name of the spouse.
In-laws would be the best clue. However, the father-in-law could be a step-father to the wife, as could the mother-in-law. Aunts, uncles and cousins could be from the husband's family. Backtrack to see the marital status of the in-laws and the relationship of the other relatives.
In he 1850-1870 censuses, relationships were not given. It is easy to assume that all of the people listed with a common surname are husband, wife, children, etc. Don't bet on it! Look at the ages to see how they match up to the head of the household. Pay particular attention to people enumerated with other surnames. If the wife is deceased, a sister or other close relative may have moved in to help raise the children. An older widow could be the wife's mother. Confirm the identity of everyone in the household.
Check neighboring families to see if they are "missing" daughter's that are close to the age of your ancestor. Also look for younger children who might have been apprenticed to a relative, or has moved in to help out with work or children.
If the kids have unusual names, look for that name among neighboring families. We're talking names like Alphonso, Ural, Cornelius, Magdalina and Hortense, not John, William, Sarah and Catherine.
Also look at the birthplaces of the spouse, that could also be a clue.
It is important to remember that families tended to migrate in groups. They also tended to associate with neighboring families or families that attended the same church. Odds of your great-grandfather who lived in Cincinnati marrying a woman from Louisville were slim, unless great-grandfather traveled to Louisville on a regular basis. If he stayed near home, chances are he married another Cincinnatian. Keep both situations in mind.
Examine the census records carefully for clues to possible family relationships. You may need to look at just one page, or you may need to look several pages forward and several back. Take the time needed; it could pay big dividends!
1880 was the first census to give relationships of those enumerated to the head of the household. If you see a person listed as an in-law, cousin, aunt, uncle, niece or nephew, then you may have a clue to the maiden name of the spouse.
In-laws would be the best clue. However, the father-in-law could be a step-father to the wife, as could the mother-in-law. Aunts, uncles and cousins could be from the husband's family. Backtrack to see the marital status of the in-laws and the relationship of the other relatives.
In he 1850-1870 censuses, relationships were not given. It is easy to assume that all of the people listed with a common surname are husband, wife, children, etc. Don't bet on it! Look at the ages to see how they match up to the head of the household. Pay particular attention to people enumerated with other surnames. If the wife is deceased, a sister or other close relative may have moved in to help raise the children. An older widow could be the wife's mother. Confirm the identity of everyone in the household.
Check neighboring families to see if they are "missing" daughter's that are close to the age of your ancestor. Also look for younger children who might have been apprenticed to a relative, or has moved in to help out with work or children.
If the kids have unusual names, look for that name among neighboring families. We're talking names like Alphonso, Ural, Cornelius, Magdalina and Hortense, not John, William, Sarah and Catherine.
Also look at the birthplaces of the spouse, that could also be a clue.
It is important to remember that families tended to migrate in groups. They also tended to associate with neighboring families or families that attended the same church. Odds of your great-grandfather who lived in Cincinnati marrying a woman from Louisville were slim, unless great-grandfather traveled to Louisville on a regular basis. If he stayed near home, chances are he married another Cincinnatian. Keep both situations in mind.
Examine the census records carefully for clues to possible family relationships. You may need to look at just one page, or you may need to look several pages forward and several back. Take the time needed; it could pay big dividends!
Monday, February 12, 2018
Researching Female Ancestors
Women get shortchanged in many cultures, be it opportunity, wages, education, treatment or other ways. The same is true when we research our ancestors. The husbands and fathers were the land and property owners. The wife's inheritance from her parents became her husband's property. George Washington's wealth increased significantly as a result of his marriage to Martha Dandridge Custis.
The farther back into the lives of our ancestors that our research takes us, the harder it can be to identify our female ancestors and their families.
As the keeping of vital records became mandatory, the names of spouses and mothers appeared in more records. Parish church records in the British Isles and Europe included bride and groom in marriage entries, but rare was the maiden name of the wife appearing in baptismal and burial records.
You may find the names of female ancestors in various combinations:
1) Given & Maiden name: [Ellen Davis] Ah, we can but hope that this is the case for all of our female ancestors!
2) Given name & Maiden name unknown: [Mrs. Ellen Reed] This is probably the most common situation. Deeds, burial records, probate and other records generated frequently listed the husband and wife in the following manner - Jacob Reed, and Ellen, his wife. There are no clear clues to the maiden name of Mrs. Reed.
3) Maiden name only: This one is rare and generally appears in earlier records. I have come across a few instances in the 1500s. Jacob Reed married a daughter of Edmond Davis, At least we have the name of her father. The other way I have seen this is Jacob Reed married a daughter of a Mr. Davis.
4) Name unknown: This one, unfortunately, is very common. No marriage record has been uncovered, the wife dies before any deeds or other records could be generated that might identify her.
She was buried in an unmarked grave on the family farm. The widower relocates and remarries, so the identity of the first wife is never known in the new location.
Now, how do you find that elusive great-grandmother or 6x great-grandmother? I'll try to tackle that issue in the next series of posts. Some of the topics that will be covered: census, land records, probate, compiled genealogies, and vital records.
Sunday, February 11, 2018
Verifying locations in published family trees
We all use published online trees from Ancestry, Family Search, Rootsweb World Connect and other sites. Some are well-documented, some not. Even the best researchers may tend to use present-day locations for the sake of convenience.
As you check over the details in a family tree, study the locations and the supporting documentation, if there is any.
Make sure that the locations are accurate to the time they are given.
Give as detailed and accurate place as possible. [city, township, county, state vs. city, state]
If your town was in the colony of Plymouth, put Plymouth Colony, not Massachusetts.
If your ancestor was born, raised, married and died in the same place, but that place changed over the years, acknowledge it in your narrative..
born: 1650 Barryville, Lewis Township, Clay Co., Newstate.
married: 1672: Sand Co., Newstate.
died: 1715 Rockcastle, Stone Twp., Green Co., Newstate.
Clay Co. formed 1647, Sand Co. formed from Clay Co. 1668. Barryville renamed Rockcastle when Sand Co divided into Stone and Pebble counties in 1709.
To simplify things, find a software program that crosschecks places for you and allows you to enter a solid and detailed location.
As you check over the details in a family tree, study the locations and the supporting documentation, if there is any.
Make sure that the locations are accurate to the time they are given.
Give as detailed and accurate place as possible. [city, township, county, state vs. city, state]
If your town was in the colony of Plymouth, put Plymouth Colony, not Massachusetts.
If your ancestor was born, raised, married and died in the same place, but that place changed over the years, acknowledge it in your narrative..
born: 1650 Barryville, Lewis Township, Clay Co., Newstate.
married: 1672: Sand Co., Newstate.
died: 1715 Rockcastle, Stone Twp., Green Co., Newstate.
Clay Co. formed 1647, Sand Co. formed from Clay Co. 1668. Barryville renamed Rockcastle when Sand Co divided into Stone and Pebble counties in 1709.
To simplify things, find a software program that crosschecks places for you and allows you to enter a solid and detailed location.
Saturday, February 10, 2018
Locating where your ancestors lived
Here are a few suggestions on getting assistance in locating where your ancestors lived -even if they didn't move after they got there.
1. Map Guide to the US Federal Census, 1790-1920 by William Thorndale. Thorndale's work only covers the census years, but gives you a good idea of changes in borders of states, territories, counties, etc. every 10 years. It's a good starting point.
2. US Genweb State Projects: There are county pages that list counties, when they were formed and identifies the parent county or counties. Some of the states will include an interactive set of maps for every few years showing boundary changes. County histories are also included that may help in identifying shifts in borders.
3. Histories on states or counties will detail border changes and county formations. This is a case where book published in the late 1800s and early 1900s come in handy. Check county bios for your ancestors.
4. Wikipedia: Check county articles for formation dates.
5. Family Search Wikis: Search state wikis for county formations and available records.
6. State Research Guides: NEHGS/American Ancestors and other organizations or libraries publish guides to the states and may include formation dates of the counties.
7. Check with your local library, genealogical or historical society for other resources to help you with your genealogy geography.
1. Map Guide to the US Federal Census, 1790-1920 by William Thorndale. Thorndale's work only covers the census years, but gives you a good idea of changes in borders of states, territories, counties, etc. every 10 years. It's a good starting point.
2. US Genweb State Projects: There are county pages that list counties, when they were formed and identifies the parent county or counties. Some of the states will include an interactive set of maps for every few years showing boundary changes. County histories are also included that may help in identifying shifts in borders.
3. Histories on states or counties will detail border changes and county formations. This is a case where book published in the late 1800s and early 1900s come in handy. Check county bios for your ancestors.
4. Wikipedia: Check county articles for formation dates.
5. Family Search Wikis: Search state wikis for county formations and available records.
6. State Research Guides: NEHGS/American Ancestors and other organizations or libraries publish guides to the states and may include formation dates of the counties.
7. Check with your local library, genealogical or historical society for other resources to help you with your genealogy geography.
Friday, February 9, 2018
Location, Location, Location: Get Your Geography Correct
Realtors press the importance of location. Genealogists and family historians should do the same. Over time boundaries change. This was the case with colonies, states, counties, townships, parishes, towns and cities. In some cases, they vanished altogether.
As I have put together the stories of my Crail, Berry and other ancestors the geography issue has come back into focus.
Some of ur ancestors settled in a given location and never moved their homestead. In the records, it would appear that they moved several times. Over the course of, say, 30 years, an individual could appear in the records of six or seven different townships or counties. If you look closely at the land description - it was the same place!
Start with the 13 Colonies. Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay, as well as parts of other eventual New England states became Massachusetts. Counties that were once part of the Bay Colony became part of New Hampshire.
The Dutch laid claim to New Netherland, which included what became New York, New Jersey and parts of other colonies/states. Sweden held part of the territory for awhile.
Virginia county seemed to disappear, get renamed or reformed on a daily basis. Not to forget that the western counties became West Virginia in 1863. Virginia also claimed what became Kentucky.
The Pennsylvania - Maryland border was disputed for a time.
Virginia and Pennsylvania laid claim to parts of the Ohio Territory, as did Connecticut to northern Ohio.
Unfortunately, many researchers latch on to the present-day location to place their ancestors. I am sure that I still have geographical errors in some of my earlier entries. Fortunately, RootsMagic has a terrific feature that pops up a message that X did not exist at that time. I also check online to be sure about locations that don't ring true. In my narratives I try to include "present-day wherever" or a reference to the modern location in some form.
Tomorrow's post will include some suggestions for geographical issues.
As I have put together the stories of my Crail, Berry and other ancestors the geography issue has come back into focus.
Some of ur ancestors settled in a given location and never moved their homestead. In the records, it would appear that they moved several times. Over the course of, say, 30 years, an individual could appear in the records of six or seven different townships or counties. If you look closely at the land description - it was the same place!
Start with the 13 Colonies. Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay, as well as parts of other eventual New England states became Massachusetts. Counties that were once part of the Bay Colony became part of New Hampshire.
The Dutch laid claim to New Netherland, which included what became New York, New Jersey and parts of other colonies/states. Sweden held part of the territory for awhile.
Virginia county seemed to disappear, get renamed or reformed on a daily basis. Not to forget that the western counties became West Virginia in 1863. Virginia also claimed what became Kentucky.
The Pennsylvania - Maryland border was disputed for a time.
Virginia and Pennsylvania laid claim to parts of the Ohio Territory, as did Connecticut to northern Ohio.
Unfortunately, many researchers latch on to the present-day location to place their ancestors. I am sure that I still have geographical errors in some of my earlier entries. Fortunately, RootsMagic has a terrific feature that pops up a message that X did not exist at that time. I also check online to be sure about locations that don't ring true. In my narratives I try to include "present-day wherever" or a reference to the modern location in some form.
Tomorrow's post will include some suggestions for geographical issues.
Thursday, February 8, 2018
Henry Berry Sr.
1. He died in Jan 1677 at the age of 51 in Old Rappahannock Co., Virginia, British America. 1 Henry Berry was probably born in England. Lancashire and Devonshire have been suggested as his birthplace. The surname Berry, with sons named Henry, appeared frequently in Lancashire and the surname Pley was found in Devonshire.
Henry was one of 18 people brought to America as a headright by Epaphraditus Lawson. Lawson was issued three land patents in Virginia on 22 May 1650; one for 2000 acres [40 people], a second for 1000 acres [20 people] and the third for 900 acres [18 people - including Henry]. The third patent straddled the Rappahannock River in Old Rappahannock Co.
Epaphraditus Lawson was fromYorkshire, England, so it is possible that Berry was from that part of England.
Henry Berry settled on Occupacia Creek [in present-day Essex Co.] and owned land on both sides of the Rappahannock River. He received a patent for 140 acres on 27 Feb 1656 for transporting three people. [Henry's plantation is believed to be opposite Leedstown, VA.]
Henry was again a headright in 1654, this time for Rowland Lawson [Epa Lawson's brother], and in 1655 for Rowland's son John. Henry either returned to England, or there were some questionable land patents.
Between 1657 and 1667, Henry was involved in eight separate land transactions involving nearly 5000 acres. By the time of his death in 1677, Henry owned about 1700 acres south of Occupacia Creek and another 550 in present-day King George Co.
Henry and Ann had at least four childrn, all sons.
Richard was the only child named in Henry's 1672 will. Henry requested that Richard receive proper learning as had his other children. This suggests that Richard was the youngest..
Henry Berry Sr. and Jr. were named executors of John Butler's estate on 26 Dec 1676. Butler's will was proved on 6 Jan 1677. Henry Sr. died about the same time as Butler.
William Berry sold land in 1688 along with brothers Richard and John. His sons, Joseph and Enoch, were named as "cousins" in the will of Henry III.
John Berry witnessed the relinquishment of land to Richard Berry by their brother Henry in 1693/4.
Ann died sometime after Henry wrote his will on 30 March 1672 in Richmond Co., as Henry made mention of his "wife's third" in the will.
Four sons have been proven in various records. Van Gundy makes mention of additional children: Peter, George and Edward.
Henry was one of 18 people brought to America as a headright by Epaphraditus Lawson. Lawson was issued three land patents in Virginia on 22 May 1650; one for 2000 acres [40 people], a second for 1000 acres [20 people] and the third for 900 acres [18 people - including Henry]. The third patent straddled the Rappahannock River in Old Rappahannock Co.
Epaphraditus Lawson was fromYorkshire, England, so it is possible that Berry was from that part of England.
Henry Berry settled on Occupacia Creek [in present-day Essex Co.] and owned land on both sides of the Rappahannock River. He received a patent for 140 acres on 27 Feb 1656 for transporting three people. [Henry's plantation is believed to be opposite Leedstown, VA.]
Henry was again a headright in 1654, this time for Rowland Lawson [Epa Lawson's brother], and in 1655 for Rowland's son John. Henry either returned to England, or there were some questionable land patents.
Between 1657 and 1667, Henry was involved in eight separate land transactions involving nearly 5000 acres. By the time of his death in 1677, Henry owned about 1700 acres south of Occupacia Creek and another 550 in present-day King George Co.
Henry and Ann had at least four childrn, all sons.
Richard was the only child named in Henry's 1672 will. Henry requested that Richard receive proper learning as had his other children. This suggests that Richard was the youngest..
Henry Berry Sr. and Jr. were named executors of John Butler's estate on 26 Dec 1676. Butler's will was proved on 6 Jan 1677. Henry Sr. died about the same time as Butler.
William Berry sold land in 1688 along with brothers Richard and John. His sons, Joseph and Enoch, were named as "cousins" in the will of Henry III.
John Berry witnessed the relinquishment of land to Richard Berry by their brother Henry in 1693/4.
Ann died sometime after Henry wrote his will on 30 March 1672 in Richmond Co., as Henry made mention of his "wife's third" in the will.
Four sons have been proven in various records. Van Gundy makes mention of additional children: Peter, George and Edward.
Henry Berry \ Barry Sr. and Ann Pley1–2 were married circa 1649 in prob England.1 She died after 1672 at the age of 44 in Old Rappahannock Co., Virginia, British America. 1 Numerous sources have Ann's maiden name as Saunders without evidence. Some of these sources have her marrying a man named Pley after Henry's death.
Other sources contend that Ann's maiden name was Pley and that she was the daughter of George Pley. On 3 Nov 1662, Henry Berry sold 200 acres of land to George Pley. On that same date, Ann Berry, wife of Henry, acknowledged that she had received her full dower of 200 acres from George Pley. [Old Rappahannock Deeds, p. 197-8] Henry Berry Jr. named one of his sons George Pley Berry.
Other sources contend that Ann's maiden name was Pley and that she was the daughter of George Pley. On 3 Nov 1662, Henry Berry sold 200 acres of land to George Pley. On that same date, Ann Berry, wife of Henry, acknowledged that she had received her full dower of 200 acres from George Pley. [Old Rappahannock Deeds, p. 197-8] Henry Berry Jr. named one of his sons George Pley Berry.
Henry Berry \ Barry and Ann Pley had the following children:
Second Generation
2. He died on 7 Dec 1695 at the age of 43 in St. Mary's Parish, Henrico, Virginia, British America. 3 A tract of 550 acres located between the Potomac and Rappahannock rivers in Stafford Co. was surveyed for Henry Berry Sr. on 10 May 1671. This land was left to Henry Jr..
On 11 Dec 1673, Henry Berry sold land to William Harper, brother of his wife, Sarah. This may have been part of Sarah's inheritance. Her father died the same month.
Henry and his father were named as executors of the estate of John Butler of Westmoreland Co., VA in 1676.
On 12 March 1693/4, Henry, then of Richmond Co., relinquished his right and interest in a tract of land that had been taken up by his father to his brother Richard. Richard sold the land to Ralph Whitton. [The Berrys were of Old Rappahannock Co., which was divided into Essex and Richmond in 1692.]
According to the Van Gundy Family Tree site, Henry and Sarah had the following children: Elizabeth, Jane, John, Martha, Rebecca, Sarah, Thomas, Henry, George Pley, and Mary. The births given for George Pley [c1696] and Mary [c1700] make the list suspect.Early Colonial Settlers of Southern Maryland & Virginia's Northern Neck offers only six children for Henry and Sarah. Deeds and wills cited on the page for Henry confirm relationships by parentage or sibling relationships. Estimated births for the six: John [c1685], Martha [bef 1689], William [13 May 1691], George Pley [c1693], Mary and Henry [c1694].
Other sites, the Gerald Berry Tree, for example, suggest an earlier birth for Henry - 1689.
.
On 11 Dec 1673, Henry Berry sold land to William Harper, brother of his wife, Sarah. This may have been part of Sarah's inheritance. Her father died the same month.
Henry and his father were named as executors of the estate of John Butler of Westmoreland Co., VA in 1676.
On 12 March 1693/4, Henry, then of Richmond Co., relinquished his right and interest in a tract of land that had been taken up by his father to his brother Richard. Richard sold the land to Ralph Whitton. [The Berrys were of Old Rappahannock Co., which was divided into Essex and Richmond in 1692.]
According to the Van Gundy Family Tree site, Henry and Sarah had the following children: Elizabeth, Jane, John, Martha, Rebecca, Sarah, Thomas, Henry, George Pley, and Mary. The births given for George Pley [c1696] and Mary [c1700] make the list suspect.Early Colonial Settlers of Southern Maryland & Virginia's Northern Neck offers only six children for Henry and Sarah. Deeds and wills cited on the page for Henry confirm relationships by parentage or sibling relationships. Estimated births for the six: John [c1685], Martha [bef 1689], William [13 May 1691], George Pley [c1693], Mary and Henry [c1694].
Other sites, the Gerald Berry Tree, for example, suggest an earlier birth for Henry - 1689.
.
Henry Berry \ Barry Jr. and Sarah Harper1,3 were married circa 1672 in Sittingborne Parish, Rappahannock, Virginia, British America.1 She died circa 1714 at the age of 59 in St. Mary's Parish, Richmond, Virginia, British America. 1 Sarah was the daughter of William Harper and Mary Gray. She had at least one sibling, a brother, William. Follwing Henry's death she married John Spiller.
Henry Berry \ Barry and Sarah Harper had the following child:
3. He died on 5 Feb 1720–2 Jun 1721 at the age of 66 in Richmond Co., Virginia, British America. 2 William had married Margaret Doughty by May 1686, as the couple was named in a deed at that time.. Margaret died before William wrote his will on 5 Feb 1720.
In his will, William named four of his children: Joseph, the eldest. Margaret [Rogers], Elizabeth [Strother] and Enoch, a minor.
Other children of the couple, proved through other documents were: John and Sarah [will of Job Webb], Henry [will of Lem Coxe] and Mary [Harding] [will of Elizabeth Bledsoe].
There may also have been a son named James.
William's will was probated 2 June 1721 in King George Co. [The part of Richmond Co. in which Berry lived had, in the meantime, become King George Co.]
In his will, William named four of his children: Joseph, the eldest. Margaret [Rogers], Elizabeth [Strother] and Enoch, a minor.
Other children of the couple, proved through other documents were: John and Sarah [will of Job Webb], Henry [will of Lem Coxe] and Mary [Harding] [will of Elizabeth Bledsoe].
There may also have been a son named James.
William's will was probated 2 June 1721 in King George Co. [The part of Richmond Co. in which Berry lived had, in the meantime, become King George Co.]
William Berry \ Barry and Margaret Doughty2 were married before May 1686 in Old Rappahannock Co., Virginia, British America.2 She died before Feb 1720 at the age of 55 in Richmond Co., Virginia, British America. 2 Margaret was the daughter of Enoch and Elizabeth Doughty. She was probably born in Charles Co., MD. As she was not mentioned in William's will, she probably predeceased him.
Sources:
1. "Henry Berry Family", database, Early Settlers of Southern Maryland & Virginia's Northern Neck (http://www.colonial-settlers-md-va.us/getperson.php?personID=I022572&tree=Tree1 : accessed 5 February 2018), "Herry Berry Family"; submitted unk by unk, [contact information for private use].
2. "Rootsweb Family Trees", database, Ancestry.com, Rootsweb World Connect (https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=jones64k&id=I1648 : accessed ), "Jones64k"; submitted 15 May 2017 by Gerald Jones, [contact information for private use].
3. "Berry Family", database, B.J. Van Gundy, Van Gundy Family Tree (http://www.vangundy.net/familytree/GP/fam/fam03601.html : accessed ), "Van Gundt Family Tree"; submitted 2010 by BJ Van Gundy, [contact information for private use].
4. "Rootsweb Family Tree", database, Ancestry.com, Rootsweb World Connect (: accessed 25 January 2018), "Gerald Berry Tree," Berry family; submitted 2007 by Gerald Berry, [contact information for private use
Wednesday, February 7, 2018
Henry Berry Jr.
1. He died on 7 Dec 1695 at the age of 43 in St. Mary's Parish, Henrico, Virginia, British America. 1 A tract of 550 acres located between the Potomac and Rappahannock rivers in Stafford Co. was surveyed for Henry Berry Sr. on 10 May 1671. This land was left to Henry Jr..
On 11 Dec 1673, Henry Berry sold land to William Harper, brother of his wife, Sarah. This may have been part of Sarah's inheritance. Her father died the same month.
Henry and his father were named as executors of the estate of John Butler of Westmoreland Co., VA in 1676.
On 12 March 1693/4, Henry, then of Richmond Co., relinquished his right and interest in a tract of land that had been taken up by his father to his brother Richard. Richard sold the land to Ralph Whitton. [The Berrys were of Old Rappahannock Co., which was divided into Essex and Richmond in 1692.]
According to the Van Gundy Family Tree site, Henry and Sarah had the following children: Elizabeth, Jane, John, Martha, Rebecca, Sarah, Thomas, Henry, George Pley, and Mary. The births given for George Pley [c1696] and Mary [c1700] make the list suspect.
Early Colonial Settlers of Southern Maryland & Virginia's Northern Neck offers only six children for Henry and Sarah. Deeds and wills cited on the page for Henry confirm relationships by parentage or sibling relationships. Estimated births for the six: John [c1685], Martha [bef 1689], William [13 May 1691], George Pley [c1693], Mary and Henry [c1694].
Other sites, the Gerald Berry Tree, for example, suggest an earlier birth for Henry - 1689.
.
On 11 Dec 1673, Henry Berry sold land to William Harper, brother of his wife, Sarah. This may have been part of Sarah's inheritance. Her father died the same month.
Henry and his father were named as executors of the estate of John Butler of Westmoreland Co., VA in 1676.
On 12 March 1693/4, Henry, then of Richmond Co., relinquished his right and interest in a tract of land that had been taken up by his father to his brother Richard. Richard sold the land to Ralph Whitton. [The Berrys were of Old Rappahannock Co., which was divided into Essex and Richmond in 1692.]
According to the Van Gundy Family Tree site, Henry and Sarah had the following children: Elizabeth, Jane, John, Martha, Rebecca, Sarah, Thomas, Henry, George Pley, and Mary. The births given for George Pley [c1696] and Mary [c1700] make the list suspect.
Early Colonial Settlers of Southern Maryland & Virginia's Northern Neck offers only six children for Henry and Sarah. Deeds and wills cited on the page for Henry confirm relationships by parentage or sibling relationships. Estimated births for the six: John [c1685], Martha [bef 1689], William [13 May 1691], George Pley [c1693], Mary and Henry [c1694].
Other sites, the Gerald Berry Tree, for example, suggest an earlier birth for Henry - 1689.
.
Henry Berry \ Barry Jr. and Sarah Harper1,3 were married circa 1672 in Sittingborne Parish, Rappahannock, Virginia, British America.3 She died circa 1714 at the age of 59 in St. Mary's Parish, Richmond, Virginia, British America. 3 Sarah was the daughter of William Harper and Mary Gray. She had at least one sibling, a brother, William. Follwing Henry's death she married John Spiller.
Henry Berry \ Barry and Sarah Harper had the following child:
Sources:
1. "Berry Family", database, B.J. Van Gundy, Van Gundy Family Tree (http://www.vangundy.net/familytree/GP/fam/fam03601.html : accessed ), "Van Gundt Family Tree"; submitted 2010 by BJ Van Gundy, [contact information for private use].
2. "Rootsweb Family Tree", database, Ancestry.com, Rootsweb World Connect (: accessed 25 January 2018), "Gerald Berry Tree," Berry family; submitted 2007 by Gerald Berry, [contact information for private use].
3. "Henry Berry Family", database, Early Settlers of Southern Maryland & Virginia's Northern Neck (http://www.colonial-settlers-md-va.us/getperson.php?personID=I022572&tree=Tree1 : accessed 5 February 2018), "Herry Berry Family"; submitted unk by unk, [contact information for private use].
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)