Tuesday, September 7, 2021

And I thought this one was going to be simple......

 Have you ever started working on a family that you KNEW was going to be an easy one on which to compile the research? AND it wasn't?

I started working on my Stillwell ancestry the other day. I was familiar with the Stillwell Genealogy from connections to the Billiou family, one of my adopted families. So, I figured to rely on that work to cover the first two Stillwell generations - Lt. Nicholas and Captain Nicholas.

What a terrible idea!  Stillwell researchers and passers-down of family lore have spent the late 19th and early 20th centuries confusing the story of immigrant Lt. Nicholas Stillwell.

Who were his parents? Siblings? When did he leave England and for where? The Netherlands, New Netherland or Virginia? Who was/were his wife/wives? 

These and other questions have multiple answers depending on which Stillwell genealogy you read.

Well, I'm sorting out facts from lore and trying to piece together a solid account of Lt. Nicholas Stillwell. I know the name of the wife of Captain Nicholas is open to debate, but hopefully that will be the only major stumbling block.

Hopefully.........

Thursday, September 2, 2021

Getting Started on the Birth Family Research

 In researching the birth family, I had to decide where to focus my attention after a flurry look-ups on both sides of the family to flesh out the Ancestry tree that was generated for me by the lady at Ged Match who was helping with sorting out my DNA results.

That tree, entitled "A Big Tree," is a work in progress. Records are added that fit and some are removed because they don't match the person to which they are attached. So there may be quite a bit of incorrect information on the tree until I get a chance to check on a particular family and correct it. 

"A Big Tree" is serving as sort of a holding pen for records and documents as I transfer information to my "Everhart-George Tree" on my RootsMagic software program. This is where the fleshed out details will go home to roost. Still, I hope to make the Ancestry tree as accurate as possible.

I decided to make my maternal line the starting point. I have several families "completed," though subject to additions and corrections. The list includes AKERS, ARBUCKLE, BLAND, CLARK, EDDY, EVERHART, GRAHAM, JOHNSTON, MONTGOMERY, ROGERS & RUSSELL.

Akers is still lacking, and needs some onsite research in Washington Co., IN, as does Russell. My Montgomery research has come to a halt until I can manage a trip to Clark Co. for some work there.

A trip to the Indiana State Library derailed the research - indirectly. I managed to find considerably more information on the paternal families of HOGUE, PHILLIPPE & STEFFY than any of my maternal lines.

The next round of posts will follow the stories of my maternal families, unless something pops up of special interest that is worthy of a post. 



Wednesday, September 1, 2021

Scots & Scots-Irish Naming of Children: Creative They Ain't!

 So far, in researching my ancestors from Scotland and Ulster, I've learned one thing - those folks were not extremely creative when it came to naming their children, especially the boys. Cases in point.......

Arbuckle: James, James, Thomas, James, Thomas, Thomas, Thomas & James. [Matthew, William, John]

Hogue: William, William, Zebulon, Zebulon, Joseph, William & Irwin. [George, Solomon, James, John, Alexander]

Graham: John, James, James, John & John. [Moses, Thomas, Elias, Joseph, Henry, Edward]

Montgomery: William & William. [John, James, Robert & Thomas.]

[Common siblings names are in parentheses.]

A few strangers pop up here and there. Elias game from a maternal line. I'm guessing Zebulon did as well, but no proof.

With large families, researching can be confusing with such creative naming. I have a James Arbuckle and his nephew James [about 6 years apart] being confused by several researchers for being the same person.

It's not until the most  recent generations that the names get a bit less traditional, Irwin Hogue, for example.

The girls' names are quite similar: Elizabeth, Jane, Ann, Mary, Sarah, Margaret, Frances, Nancy, Susan/Susannah and a few others are found in nearly every generation. Add to that the common nicknames: Betsy, Sally, Fannie, Polly, etc

For  those of you doing Scots & Scots-Irish research hoping to find a plethera of "traditional Scottish given names" such as Donald, Malcolm, Neil, Stuart, Lalan, Alistair, Aec,  Ailsa, Bonnie. Catriona or Eilidh. Hope away! 

I have one Malcom from c1635 and an Ailsa from 1820. 

Expect James, John, William, Thomas, Sarah, Ann, Nancy and Mary to come crawling out of the Highland, Lowland, Borderland and Ulster woodwork!

Thursday, June 3, 2021

Family Lore: An Immigrant Ancestor Story - Fact, Fiction or Misdirected?

 One of the more fascinating immigrant ancestor stories on my paternal line is that of William Hogue and Barbara Hume.

The year is 1682. William Hogue, aged 22, boards the ship Caledonia at the port in Glasgow, Scotland. Also boarding the ship are Sir James Hume, his wife Marjorie Johnstone and their daughter, Barbara, aged 12. William is the son of Sir James Hogue and Lady Marjorie Lambert. The Humes were allied to the House of Stuart and fleeing their homeland for America.

On the voyage, the Humes and other passengers died from some unknown illness. William Hogue took the orphaned Barbara Hume under his wing until they landed at the port of New York. Marjorie Hume's brother was an established physician and community leader in New York.  William dropped Barbara off with her Uncle John and settled in Perth Amboy in East Jersey.

William apparently stayed in touch, as about 1687, he and Barbara were married. They would have 11 children. After a time in Perth Amboy, they would move on to New Castle Co., Delaware, Chester Co., Pennsylvania and Frederick Co., Virginia.

The story, however, has a few glitches:

1) There is no passenger list or other record available for the 1682 Caledonia.

2) There is no birth record for a Barbara Hume born in 1670 to James and Marjorie Hume; there is however a birth record for Barbara Hume daughter of John Hume and Jonet Falconer on 13 July 1670 in Haddington, East Lothian, Scotland.

3) Dr. John Johnstone did not reach the colonies did not reach New York until 1685 on the Henry and Francis. His brother, John, arrived a year earlier.

4) Jonet Falconer Hume probably died in childbirth in 1680. John Hume remarried later that year to Isobel Johnstone, sister to John and James.

5) The Henry and Francis sailed to New York in 1685. John Johnstone, Euphame Scott and her parents were on the passenger list. The Scotts took sick and died. John and Euphame married 16 April 1686 in Perth Amboy.

What is the truth behind the Hogue/Hume saga?

Most sources have William and Barbara in the colonies and married between 1685 and 1687. What happened to Barbara's father and step-mother has yet to be determined.  Did Isobel Johnstone Hume tell Barbara and/or the grandchildren about the tragedy of The Henry and Francis? Was the story passed down, eventually becoming the story of William and Barbara?

Under what circumstances did William and Barbara arrive in New York? 

Could Barbara have arrived with her Uncle James? 

Did she come over after 1685 with her family? [The youngest of the issue of John and Isobel was born in Haddington in February 1685.]

Donald Whyte's A Dictionary of Scottish Immigrants to the USA has William Hogg arriving in Perth Amboy about 1687. [The remaining details in the entry confirm this is the same William Hoge.]

Some sources have Hogue children born as early as 1680 - when Barbara was 10, so scratch them off the list.

I guess for now, the Hogue - Hume story gets an asterisk.

Post Script: After wrapping up this post, I went back to Scotland's People to double-check on John Hume's children with Jonet Falconer & Isobel Johnstone to make sure I had all of the kids accounted for. The plot thickens! There may well have been two John Humes residing in Haddington, East Lothian, Scotland.

John Hume married Jonet [also Jennett, Janet] Falconer in 1668 and had the following children:     (1) Barbara: 17  July 1670                                                                                                                          (2) Margaret: 8 April 1677                                                                                                                        (3) John: 13 June 1680                                                                                                                              (4) James: 26 August 1683

John Hume married Issobel Johnstone in 1680 and they had the following children:                            (1) Margaret: 31 October 1681                                                                                                                  (2) Jennett: 7 November 1682                                                                                                                  (3) Helen: 14 February 1685

John and Jonet had a child in 1683 after John and Isobel married had married in 1680. That means two John Humes. It is also interesting to note that there appears a birth record for Jeane Hume [Hoome], daughter of John Hume and Isobel Falconer on 10 August 1673.

This little revalation generates ore questions than answers and sheds a different light on the Hogue - Hume story.

The "New Family Tree"

 Well, it's about time to start posting on the "new family tree" or the birth family. According to my Ancestry DNA test, my heritage is 45% England & NW Europe, 35% Scotland, 15% Ireland & 5% Norway. So far Norway hasn't made an appearance. Maybe that 5% goes back to the Vikings wreaking havoc on the British Isles!😀 

I've started working with my maternal birth line on compiling the tree. However, some bits of info pop up on the paternal line, so they are dealt with as they come. 

I have two trees going. One, public, on Ancestry.com and the other using my RootsMagic software. My Ancestry tree is entitled "A Big Tree." My main focus is on the RootsMagic tree, so it will be detailed more than the Ancestry tree.

The Ancestry tree was created with the assistance of the staff from DNA Detectives. They were at the mercy of  the people who posted the material. As I go through the tree I am finding errors and making corrections. I'm sure incorrect information abounds in lines I have yet to check out.

Fortunately, I have a handful of cousins with whom to compare notes.

So, as the opportunity arises, I will be posting research on different branches of the birth family.

Friday, May 14, 2021

Prall Family Website [& Facebook page] At Long Last!!!!

 For those of you scrounging the internet or my old blog posts for Prall information, there will soon be a new venue for Prall news and information!

After having our old website lay dormant for close to a dozen years, the Prall Family Association's new webmaster, Crystal Wilken, is preparing a new, updated Prall family website and Facebook page.

This should allow Prall cousins with internet access to share information, ask questions and make connections with new and old cousins.

I've been hoping for some time to get a new website up and running with someone with the skills to manage it. Now, with Crystal, I think we've got it!

As soon as updates are available on the new PFA website from Crystal, I'll post them here, so keep checking back!

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

The Thoroughgood Family: Time for Corrections

 In my post on the Thoroughgood family I have relied on a compilation of sources that have apparently been based on incorrect assumptions.

Ann Thoroghgood, daughter of  Sir John Thoroughgood and Frances Meautys, who married Thomas Keeling was apparently incorrectly assigned to that family.

Thomas and Ann Keeling named a son Adam and another Thoroughgood. It was therefore assumed that she was closely related to Adam Thoroughgood, who transported Thomas Keeling to Virginia in 1628.

Keeling worked off his indenture, returned to England and married Ann, returning to Virginia about 1634/5.

Ann's birth has been given as 1613 or 1618. In various sources she has been identified as the daughter or granddaughter of Sir William Thoroughgood; daughter of Sir John; or daughter or sister of Adam. She iss not named in the wills of William or John, thus eliminating her as Adam's sister. She would be too old to be his daughter. 

.The 17th Century Families of John Martin & Thomas Keeling of Lower Norfolk, Virginia suggests that Ann's maiden name is unknown.

There was a Thomas Thorowgood, mariner, who could have been her father. An Ann Thoroughgood, daughter of John, was christened at Sawbridgewoth, Hertfordshire, England on 27 Feb 1613. The identity of this John is not clear.

If Ann was not the daughter of a Thoroughgood male, could she have been the daughter of one of the Thoroughgood women? That would still link her to Adam Thoroughgood in some capacity.

Was the naming of Adam and Thoroughgood Keeling simply a tribute to the man who brought Thomas Keeling to Virginia? Could Adam's wife served as midwife in the births of the Keeling children? Was Ann indeed a Thoroughgood?

Several new mysteries to be unraveled.

[And yes, I do intend to start posting on the "new family." I just need to find the time to get started!]